The folly of verifying revelation using science

The point is that there is no logical difference between natural and revealed theology when it comes to the issue of how we verifying their respective truths.

There's a difference between verifying the natural and verifying the revealed. In the former, there's a plethora of scientific methods at your disposal, whereas in the latter--since it is supernatural and therefore incompatible with the natural sciences--you only have legal devices to play with, i.e., relying on the testimony of witnesses as recorded in history. Once science reaches full understanding of how the universe works, only then could science be used to validate revelation.